I wouldn't say so. There'll be two parameters for each: one set for classic stats, one set for Remastered stats. The infobox will only display rows which have a value that isn't empty space, so if a statistic isn't included under Remastered, the viewer can take it that it's not changed in any way. Remastered Stats is only for the ships in which they have different statistics from the original (for example, let's just say the classic Scout does 10 damage and Remastered changed it to 12 damage, but the amount of health is the same. Classic would record both damage and health, but Remastered will only record the damage, not health).

Make sense? I don't think having two Infoboxes under a tab design is a good idea, but I would definitely like to hear from Zeta (and the others who view the wiki) on that matter before writing it into a policy document.

Yea, makes sense. I would say: No harm giving it a try. It's a template, so if we won't like it - we can change it. But there's absolutely no harm getting it on. So: go for it. :)

If I may interject, one thing that might be worth incorporating from HWR is the upgraded graphics. Basically, we could do something that other wikis such as the Metal Gear Wiki, the FR Wiki, or the Evangelion Wiki do for articles that cover a subject that has more than one "definitive" visualization, which is to show all versions in the infobox, but with the most recent one usually given priority.

To give an example of how this would work, basically, we'd post an image of (say) a Kushan scout from HWR in the infobox along wth the same ship from HW vanilla, each with a tab projected from the top which would allow readers to switch between each visual at will. The HWR version would get priority, which would keep the wiki "visually fresh" and provide some eye candy for newcomers who might find the original graphics dated.

It's just a suggestion though. For the most part, I don't think HWR will have that much content to contribute, at least in comparison to Shipbreakers.

Yea, we've already been discussing that and it seems like everyone agree that using tabs is a fine idea, even if we disagree in the exact way of implementing tabs.

After Gearbox announced that fuel will not be present within HW: Remastered (for the original), this means that some strategies aren't as relevant as they used to be. Should a whole new section of articles for the HW Remastered campaign be created, or should it be an appendix to the existing campaign?

I'd put an appendix, otherwise we'd have plenty of articles that are identical in every way with exception of fuel. ;)

Sounds like a plan. Which leads me to another point: some of our existing articles on missions either have no strategy, or don't follow the standards of the other mission articles. Excluding Cataclysm, any ideas on how to proceed?

Oh and the new infoboxes are being rolled out slowly across articles.

I'd probably appendix the main articles with HWR strategies myself. Since it's the original version, I'd say strategies for the original game (which is still included as "classic mode") take priority.

I agree. Not to mention, from all the reports I've read, HWR is way too easy with a lot of older strategies being invalid (HWR actually uses the same dynamic scaler that HW2 used, and the Bentusi are destructible lol)

It does sound like there are some balance issues with HWR and from what little I've played with it I can tell some strategies will need to be rethought (although for the most part I'm not taking this as negatively as some people; while I prefer HW1 and HWC's stories I think HW2 probably is the better game mechanically). In particular, it seems as though the repercussions of implementing HW2 mechanics onto the HW1 campaign weren't entirely thought through, although the fact that MP is still in Beta means Gearbox may be aware there have been difficulties.

It'll be interesting to see if Gearbox patches the game to be more like HW1 in the long run or whether modders try to rebalance it. I don't think the game necessarily needs to play exactly like HW1, but if HW2 mechanics are implemented, there probably needs to be some tweaking to make sure they work properly.